California Dispute Resolution Council
-- -- -- --
Homepage
-- -- -- --
History of CDRC
-- -- -- --
Legislation
-- -- -- --
Reports from Donne Brownsey
-- -- -- --
What
-- -- -- --
Principles
-- -- -- --
Standards
-- -- -- --
Organization
-- -- -- --
Policy and Reports
-- -- -- --
Membership
-- -- -- --
Programs & Events
-- -- -- --
Community Mediation Coalition
-- -- -- --
Comments
-- -- -- --
Contact

 

 


Legislation > Pending Legislation > July 2008 Report

CDRC Legislative Status Report

 

AB 567(Saldana) Common Interest Development Bureau.

Introduced: 02/21/2007

Last Amend: 06/25/2008

Status: 06/26/2008-Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Location: 06/26/2008-S APPR.

 

Summary:  Existing law, the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, defines and regulates common interest developments, which include condominiums and planned developments. The act requires that a common interest development be managed by an association, and establishes requirements for association operating rules and meetings and for the resolution of specified disputes. This bill would, until January 1, 2014, establish in the Department of Consumer Affairs the Common Interest Development Bureau. The bill would require the bureau, among other things, to offer training materials and courses to common interest development directors, officers, and owners, in subjects relevant to the operation of a common interest development and the rights and duties of an association or owner. The bill would require the bureau to maintain a toll-free telephone number and Internet Web site for purposes of further providing that information and assistance, and would require an association director or agent to meet certain requirements in that regard. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

 

History:

June 26 Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

June 25 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

June 24 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 4.) .

June 19 Re-referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and JUD.

June 18 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on RLS. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 6.) .

June 10 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Feb. 14 Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and RLS.

Jan. 30 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

Jan. 29 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 45. Noes 31. Page 3853.)

Jan. 24 In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5. Page 3814.) (January 24). Read second time. To third reading.

Jan. 18 Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Jan. 17 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

Jan. 16 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (January 16).

Apr. 23 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Apr. 11 Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

Apr. 10 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.

Apr. 9 Referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

Feb. 22 From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

Feb. 21 Read first time. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

AB 611(Nakanishi) Contractors: arbitration procedures.

Introduced: 02/21/2007

Last Amend: 06/12/2008

Status: 06/24/2008-From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) .

Location: 06/24/2008-S APPR.

 

Summary: Existing law, the Contractors' State License Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of contractors by the Contractors' State License Board in the Department of Consumer Affairs. This bill would increase that amount to $100,000. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

 

History:

June 24 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) .

June 19 Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

June 16 Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

June 12 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

Jan. 31 Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

Sept. 10 From inactive file. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. (Page 2483.)

Sept. 7 Read third time, amended, and returned to third reading. To inactive file on motion of Senator Cox.

July 20 Read second time, amended, and to third reading.

July 19 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) .

July 3 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) .

June 25 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

June 19 Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

June 18 From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & E.D. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) .

May 23 Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B., P. & E.D.

May 17 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1526.)

May 17 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

May 14 Read second time. To third reading.

May 10 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 9).

Apr. 25 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 24).

Apr. 18 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 17).

Apr. 16 Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.

Apr. 12 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.

Apr. 10 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Apr. 9 Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.

Mar. 29 Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and HEALTH. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.

Feb. 22 From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

Feb. 21 Read first time. To print.

 

Position: Support

 

AB 1092(Emmerson) Recreational vehicles.

Introduced: 02/23/2007

Last Amend: 07/17/2007

Status: 10/10/2007-Chaptered by the Secretary of State, Chapter Number 406, Statutes of 2007

Location: 10/10/2007-A CHAPTERED

 

Summary: Existing law prohibits a manufacturer, manufacturer branch, distributor, or distributor branch that is licensed under the Vehicle Code from engaging in certain conduct involving a dealer having a franchise for the sale of new vehicles or vehicle parts. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill contains other existing laws.

 

History:

Oct. 10 Approved by the Governor.

Oct. 10 Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 406, Statutes of 2007.

Sept. 17 Enrolled and to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

Sept. 5 Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 2925.) Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2936.)

Sept. 4 Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 2. Page 2274.)

Sept. 4 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 6 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

Aug. 21 Read second time. To third reading.

Aug. 20 From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

July 17 Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

July 16 From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) .

June 28 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

June 27 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) .

June 18 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.

June 6 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

May 23 Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and JUD.

May 17 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 1535.)

May 17 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

May 14 Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

May 10 From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 9).

Apr. 24 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 23).

Apr. 11 Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

Apr. 10 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.

Apr. 9 Referred to Com. on TRANS.

Feb. 26 Read first time.

Feb. 25 From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.

Feb. 23 Introduced. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

AB 1248(Evans) Courts.

Introduced: 02/23/2007

Last Amend: 09/05/2007

Status: 10/14/2007-Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 738, Statutes of 2007.

Location: 10/14/2007-A CHAPTERED

 

Summary:  Existing law requires the Administrative Office of the Courts to make monthly distributions from superior court filing fees to the law library fund in each county in specified amounts. This bill would increase the amount of these monthly distributions for the Counties of Inyo, Mendocino, Plumas, and San Benito, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

 

History:

Oct. 14 Approved by the Governor.

Oct. 14 Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 738, Statutes of 2007.

Oct. 2 Enrolled and to the Governor at 10:45 a.m.

Sept. 12 Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 73. Noes 1. Page 3326.)

Sept. 11 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

Sept. 10 Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 5. Page 2518.)

Sept. 6 Read second time. To third reading.

Sept. 5 Read third time, amended. To second reading.

Aug. 31 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) . Read second time. To third reading.

Aug. 20 In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.

Aug. 1 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

July 17 Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

July 16 From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) .

July 9 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

June 25 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

June 19 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

June 14 Referred to Com. on JUD.

June 5 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

June 4 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 1. Page 1822.)

June 1 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 31). Read second time. To third reading.

May 10 In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

May 1 Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Apr. 30 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

Apr. 17 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 17).

Apr. 12 Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

Apr. 11 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

Apr. 10 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

Mar. 28 Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

Mar. 27 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

Mar. 15 Referred to Com.

Position: Watch

 

AB 1725(Lieu) Evaluation of judicial appointments.

Introduced: 03/06/2007

Last Amend: 07/02/2008

Status: 07/03/2008-Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.

Location: 07/03/2008-S APPR.

 

Summary: Existing law requires the Governor to submit the names of all potential appointees or nominees for a judicial office to a designated agency of the State Bar of California for evaluation of the qualifications of those appointees or nominees. Within 90 days of submission by the Governor, the State Bar is required to report its recommendation regarding the candidate, as specified. Existing law authorizes the State Bar, if the Governor has appointed a person to a trial court who has been found not qualified by the designated agency, to make this fact public after due notice to the appointee of its intention to do so. This bill would provide that any State Bar recommendation reported to the Governor shall be null and void 3 years after the date of the report. The bill would require the Governor to resubmit the name of a candidate to the designated agency of the State Bar for a new evaluation and recommendation if the candidate remains under consideration for judicial appointment. Upon the appointment of a person to a trial court by the Governor, the bill would require the State Bar to make public that person' s rating .

 

History:

July 3 Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.

July 2 Read second time, amended, and to third reading.

July 1 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) .

June 19 Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

June 11 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee. Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

May 8 Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

May 6 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

Sept. 10 Re-referred to Com. on RLS. (Page 2483.)

Sept. 7 Read third time, amended, and returned to third reading.

July 9 From Consent Calendar. To third reading.

July 3 Read second time, amended, and to Consent Calendar.

July 2 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar.

June 18 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

May 9 Referred to Com. on JUD.

Apr. 23 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 1115.)

Apr. 23 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

Apr. 18 Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

Apr. 17 From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 17).

Apr. 11 Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

Apr. 10 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

Apr. 9 Referred to Com. on JUD.

Mar. 7 From printer. May be heard in committee April 6.

Mar. 6 Read first time. To print.

 

Position: Spot Bill - Watch

 

AB 2161(Swanson) Loans: consumer complaints.

Introduced: 02/20/2008

Last Amend: 06/26/2008

Status: 06/26/2008-Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Location: 06/26/2008-S APPR.

 

Summary:  The Real Estate Law provides, among other things, for the licensure and regulation by the Real Estate Commissioner of real estate brokers. Existing law requires the commissioner to apply the guidance on nontraditional mortgage product risks, as specified, to these licensees and authorizes the commissioner to adopt regulations in this regard. This bill would require the commissioner, on or before January 1, 2010, and annually thereafter, until January 1, 2012, to submit a written report to the Legislature containing aggregated data relating to consumer complaints involving loans covered by the guidance described above and real estate broker compliance. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

 

History:

June 26 Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

June 25 From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) .

June 5 Referred to Com. on B., F. & I.

May 28 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

May 27 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 15. Page 5372.)

May 23 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 22). Read second time. To third reading.

May 7 In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

Apr. 23 Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Apr. 22 Read second time and amended.

Apr. 21 From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.) (April 14).

Apr. 7 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Apr. 1 Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.

Mar. 28 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.

Mar. 5 Referred to Com. on B. & F.

Feb. 21 From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

Feb. 20 Read first time. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

AB 2164(Nakanishi) County law libraries.

Introduced: 02/20/2008

Last Amend: 04/22/2008

Status: 05/30/2008-Failed Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(11). Last location was APPR. SUSPENSE FILE

Location: 06/09/2008-A DEAD

 

Summary:  Existing law requires the Administrative Office of the Courts to make monthly distributions from superior court filing fees to the law library fund in each county in specified amounts. The board of supervisors of each county was authorized, until January 1, 2008, to increase the amount distributed to its county law library fund from those filing fees whenever it determined that the increase was necessary to defray the expenses of the law library, as specified. Distribution changes after January 1, 2008, are required to be determined according to a specified process. This bill would require the commission on civil court fees established by the Judicial Council to review the level of funding needed to support county law libraries. The bill would require, no later than March 1, 2010, that the Judicial Council make recommendations to the Legislature regarding funding needs, potential sources of funding, service mission and delivery models, as well as the long-term facility needs of county law libraries, as specified. The bill would require the Judicial Council to consult with specified entities before making its recommendations .

 

History:

May 22 In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.

May 14 In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

Apr. 23 Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Apr. 22 Read second time and amended.

Apr. 21 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 8).

Apr. 1 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

Mar. 25 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

Mar. 5 Referred to Com. on JUD.

Feb. 21 From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

Feb. 20 Read first time. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

AB 2193(Tran) Civil discovery: out-of-state proceedings.

Introduced: 02/20/2008

Last Amend: 06/24/2008

Status: 07/03/2008-In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

Location: 07/03/2008-A CONCURRENCE

 

Summary: Existing law permits a California court, by subpoena, to compel a natural person to submit to oral or written deposition, and to produce documents and things, in connection with actions pending outside of California. Existing law specifies the circumstances pursuant to which this power will be exercised, including when the out-of-state court has issued a mandate, a writ, and a letter of request. This bill would repeal these provisions and would enact the Interstate and International Depositions and Discovery Act. The provisions of the bill, beginning January 1, 2010, would apply to an organization as well as a natural person, and would apply to depositions for the production of tangible items and inspection of premises, in addition to those requiring testimony. The bill would broaden the range of documents issued by an out-of-state court pursuant to which a California court would be authorized to issue a subpoena in this regard. The bill would establish a process for obtaining a subpoena, which would require payment of a fee, to be deposited in the Trial Court Trust Fund, and submitting the subpoena of the out-of-state court with a specified application. The bill would establish a specified fee to be paid related to disputes that arise under its provisions. The bill would provide that a party is not required to retain a local attorney to depose a witness in these circumstances. The bill would permit an active member of the California State Bar who is retained by a party to an out-of-state proceeding to issue a deposition subpoena, as specified. The bill would provide a process for the resolution of a dispute regarding discovery conducted in California in connection with an out-of-state proceeding, and a request for relief in this regard would be filed in the superior court in which the discovery is sought with payment of specified fees. The bill would permit a party to appeal court orders in connection with a dispute by extraordinary writ to the appropriate court of appeal. The bill, beginning January 1, 2009, would require the Judicial Council to prepare an application form, and to either create subpoena forms, or modify existing subpoena forms, for issuance pursuant to its provisions. This bill contains other related provisions.

 

History:

July 3 Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0.)

July 3 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

July 1 Read second time. To third reading.

June 30 From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

June 24 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

June 17 Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

June 16 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) .

June 2 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

May 1 Referred to Com. on JUD.

Apr. 22 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

Apr. 21 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 4749.)

Apr. 10 Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

Apr. 9 From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 9).

Mar. 25 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 4327.) (March 25).

Mar. 5 Referred to Com. on JUD.

Feb. 21 From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

Feb. 20 Read first time. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

AB 2220(Jones) Health care service plans: hospital-based physician contracts: arbitration.

Introduced: 02/20/2008

Last Amend: 07/02/2008

Status: 07/02/2008-Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Location: 07/02/2008-S APPR.

 

Summary: Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law requires that contracts with providers, among others, be fair, reasonable, and consistent with the objectives of the act, and provide a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill contains other existing laws.

 

History:

July 2 Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

July 1 From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) .

June 19 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) .

June 12 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

June 5 Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.

May 29 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

May 28 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 44. Noes 31. Page 5519.)

May 27 Read second time. To third reading.

May 23 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 22). Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

May 14 In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

Apr. 23 Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Apr. 22 Read second time and amended.

Apr. 21 From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (April 15).

Apr. 7 Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

Apr. 3 Referred to Com. on HEALTH. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

Feb. 21 From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

Feb. 20 Read first time. To print.

 

Position: Support

 

AB 2336(Nakanishi) Contractors: arbitration procedures.

Introduced: 02/21/2008

Last Amend:

Status: 06/02/2008-Failed Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(11). Last location was JUD.

Location: 06/02/2008-A DEAD

 

Summary: Existing law, the Contractors' State License Law, provides for the licensing and regulation of contractors by the Contractors' State License Board in the Department of Consumer Affairs. This bill would increase that amount to $100,000. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

 

History:

Apr. 8 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Apr. 1 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

Mar. 5 Referred to Coms. on JUD. and B. & P.

Feb. 22 From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

Feb. 21 Read first time. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

AB 2359(Jones) Loans.

Introduced: 02/21/2008

Last Amend: 05/27/2008

Status: 06/18/2008-In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

Location: 06/19/2008-S B., F. & I.

 

Summary:  Existing law regulates the process of foreclosure on real property subject to a mortgage or deed of trust. Existing law provides that any express agreement made or entered into by a borrower at the time of or in connection with the making of or renewing of any loan secured by any instrument creating a lien on real property, whereby the borrower agrees to waive specified rights or privileges conferred upon him or her, shall be void. Existing law excepts from these provisions any deed of trust, mortgage, or other liens given to secure the payment of bonds or other indebtedness authorized or permitted to be issued by the Commissioner of Corporations or made by a public utility, as specified. This bill would prohibit a broker, trustee, or mortgagee, or his or her agent, beneficiary, or assigns from requiring as a condition of an agreement regarding a covered loan, subprime loan, or nontraditional mortgage, as defined, that a borrower or an applicant for the loan waive any rights, duties, remedies, forums , or procedures of California law with respect to a residential mortgage or mortgage foreclosure. This bill contains other related provisions.

 

History:

June 18 In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

June 12 Referred to Coms. on B., F. & I. and JUD.

June 6 (Corrected June 6.)

June 2 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

May 29 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 45. Noes 32. Page 5546.)

May 27 Read third time, amended, and returned to third reading. (Page 5344.).

May 15 Read third time, amended, and returned to third reading. (Page 5133.).

Apr. 29 Read second time. To third reading.

Apr. 28 Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

Apr. 24 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 21).

Apr. 14 In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Apr. 7 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Apr. 1 Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.

Mar. 28 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.

Mar. 6 Referred to Com. on B. & F.

Feb. 22 From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

Feb. 21 Read first time. To print.

 

Position: Oppose Unless Amend

 

AB 2846(Feuer) Common interest developments: assessments.

Introduced: 02/22/2008

Last Amend: 06/19/2008

Status: 07/02/2008-From CONSENT CALENDAR: To THIRD READING.

Location: 07/02/2008-S THIRD READING

Calendar: 07/07/08 148 SEN THIRD READING FILE

 

Summary: The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act provides for the creation and regulation of common interest developments and for the levying of assessments by homeowners' associations. Under the act, a homeowners' association or an owner of a separate interest in a common interest development may not file a civil action in the superior court relating to enforcement of the act or certain other matters unless the parties have endeavored to submit their dispute to alternative dispute resolution in accordance with specified procedures. This requirement does not apply to a small claims action or an assessment dispute. The act requires an association to distribute a written notice regarding assessments and foreclosure to each member of the association during the 60-day period immediately preceding the beginning of the association's fiscal year, as specified. This bill would provide that, if a dispute exists between the owner of a separate interest and the homeowners' association regarding any disputed charge or sum levied by the association, and the amount in dispute does not exceed the jurisdictional limits of the small claims court, the owner of the separate interest may pay under protest the disputed amount and all other amounts levied , including certain fees, costs, and other specified amounts, and commence an action in small claims court. The bill would make related changes to the notice described above.

 

History:

June 26 Read second time. To third reading.

June 25 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) .

June 19 Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

June 18 From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) .

May 22 Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and JUD.

May 15 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 5136.)

May 15 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

May 5 Read second time. To third reading.

May 1 Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

Apr. 30 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 30).

Apr. 23 Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

Apr. 22 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.

Mar. 13 Referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

Feb. 25 Read first time.

Feb. 24 From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.

Feb. 22 Introduced. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

AB 2947(Eng) Elder and dependent adult abuse: waiver of rights.

Introduced: 02/22/2008

Last Amend: 07/02/2008

Status: 07/02/2008-Read second time, amended, and to third reading.

Location: 07/02/2008-S THIRD READING

Calendar: 07/07/08 171 SEN THIRD READING FILE

 

Summary: Existing law, the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act, establishes procedures for the reporting, investigation, and prosecution of elder and dependent adult abuse. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2009, prohibit a residential care facility for the elderly that provides care to an elder or dependent adult from requiring, as a condition of admission to, or of continued care or residence at, the facility that an elder or dependent adult, or his or her representative , waive any legal rights, duties, remedies, forums, or procedures under the act, including the right to file and pursue a complaint with the State Department of Social Services, or a law enforcement agency, or to file and pursue a civil action based on a claim for physical abuse, neglect, or death . This bill contains other related provisions.

 

History:

July 2 Read second time, amended, and to third reading.

July 1 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) .

June 19 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

June 11 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) .

May 29 Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.

May 22 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 43. Noes 26. Page 5255.)

May 22 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

May 8 Read second time. To third reading.

May 7 Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

May 6 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 29).

Apr. 9 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 8).

Apr. 7 Re-referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C.

Apr. 3 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGING & L.T.C. Read second time and amended.

Mar. 13 Referred to Coms. on AGING & L.T.C. and JUD.

Feb. 25 Read first time.

Feb. 24 From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.

Feb. 22 Introduced. To print.

 

Position: Oppose Unless Amend

 

AB 3053(Committee on Judiciary) Domestic relations.

Introduced: 02/28/2008

Last Amend: 04/02/2008

Status: 07/03/2008-In Assembly. To enrollment.

Location: 07/03/2008-A ENROLLMENT

 

Summary: Existing law establishes procedures related to proceedings for dissolution of marriage, nullity of marriage, and legal separation, as specified. Existing law, the Collaborative Family Law Act, allows the parties to those proceedings, by written agreement, to use a collaborative law process, as defined, rather than an adversarial judicial proceeding to resolve those disputes. This bill would direct the court to refrain from requiring court appearances inconsistent with the parties' agreement absent good cause.

 

History:

July 3 In Assembly. To enrollment.

July 2 Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.)

June 26 Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

June 25 From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar.

Apr. 24 Referred to Com. on JUD.

Apr. 14 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 4631.)

Apr. 14 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

Apr. 9 Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

Apr. 8 From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 8).

Apr. 3 Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

Apr. 2 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

Apr. 1 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

Mar. 13 Referred to Coms. on JUD. and PUB. S.

Feb. 29 From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

Feb. 28 Read first time. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

SB 396(Ridley-Thomas) Civil court filing fees.

Introduced: 02/21/2007

Last Amend: 07/12/2007

Status: 10/14/2007-Vetoed by the Governor

Location: 10/14/2007-S VETOED

 

Summary: Existing law imposes various fees for filing specified documents in connection with civil court litigation. This bill would require the Judicial Council to establish an advisory commission on civil court fees with a broad-based membership, appointed as specified, to review issues relating to civil court fees and make recommendations to the Legislature as appropriate. The bill would require the Judicial Council to report to the Legislature on February 1 of each odd-numbered year on issues related to civil court fees, including the effectiveness of the fee structure, the performance of the revenues, and the funding needs of the entities that rely on filing fee revenues. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

 

History:

Feb. 13 Stricken from Senate file. Veto sustained.

Oct. 14 Vetoed by Governor.

Oct. 14 In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)

Sept. 11 Enrolled. To Governor at 9 a.m.

Sept. 5 Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 21. Noes 15. Page 2319.) To enrollment.

Sept. 4 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 47. Noes 30. Page 2857.) To Senate.

Sept. 4 In Senate. To unfinished business.

Aug. 31 Read second time. To third reading.

Aug. 30 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)

Aug. 22 Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

July 12 Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

July 11 From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.)

July 10 Hearing postponed by committee.

June 19 Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

June 6 Hearing postponed by committee.

May 17 To Com. on JUD.

May 7 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 16. Page 868.) To Assembly.

May 7 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

Apr. 24 Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

Apr. 23 From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.

Apr. 11 From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 519.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Set for hearing April 23.

Apr. 9 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

Mar. 28 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD. Set for hearing April 10.

Feb. 28 To Com. on JUD.

Feb. 22 From print. May be acted upon on or after March 24.

Feb. 21 Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

 

Position: Co-sponsor

 

SB 892(Corbett) Family law: child support.

Introduced: 02/23/2007

Last Amend: 06/21/2007

Status: 10/10/2007-Chaptered by the Secretary of State, Chapter Number 441, Statutes of 2007

Location: 10/10/2007-S CHAPTERED

 

Summary:  Before entry of a child support order, existing law allows a child support obligor to file an application with the court to reduce or eliminate the related child support security deposit, if specified conditions are met. This bill would also require the child support obligor, after the filing of that application, to serve the application and supporting financial and other information upon the child support obligee and any other party to the proceeding. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

 

History:

Oct. 10 Approved by Governor.

Oct. 10 Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 441, Statutes of 2007.

Sept. 12 Enrolled. To Governor at 4 p.m.

Sept. 6 Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2408.) To enrollment.

Sept. 5 To Special Consent Calendar.

July 20 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2571.) To Senate.

July 20 In Senate. To unfinished business.

July 16 Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

July 12 From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)

June 26 From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

June 21 To Com. on JUD.

June 21 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

June 7 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1335.) To Assembly.

June 7 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

June 5 Read second time. To third reading. To Special Consent Calendar.

June 4 Read third time. Amended. To second reading.

May 14 From Consent Calendar to third reading.

May 10 Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

May 9 From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 911.)

Apr. 26 Set for hearing May 8.

Apr. 25 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

Apr. 19 Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

Mar. 15 To Com. on RLS.

Feb. 26 Read first time.

Feb. 25 From print. May be acted upon on or after March 27.

Feb. 23 Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

SB 981(Perata) Health care coverage: noncontracting emergency physician claims.

Introduced: 02/23/2007

Last Amend: 06/17/2008

Status: 06/25/2008-Hearing postponed by committee. (Refers to 6/24/2008 hearing)

Location: 06/24/2008-A HEALTH

 

Summary: Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the payment of provider claims and the resolution of claim disputes, as specified , and requires health care service plans to ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claim disputes . Existing law establishes an independent medical review system in which requests for review of disputed health care services, as defined, are conducted by an independent medical review organization. This bill would enact various provisions applicable to noncontracting emergency physicians , as defined . The bill would require that payment for each coded and charged covered service rendered by a noncontracting emergency physician be made at the lesser of the physician's full charge or the interim payment standard. The bill would authorize the physician to file a complaint with the department if a health care service plan or its contracting risk-bearing organization unde rpays or fails to make that payment and would require the department to investigate the complaint, make a determination within a specified time period, and, if the complaint is substantiated, take appropriate enforcement action and require the plan or its risk-bearing organization to make specified payments. The bill would enact other related provisions. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

 

History:

June 24 Hearing postponed by committee.

June 18 Hearing postponed by committee.

June 17 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. (Corrected June 19.)

Sept. 10 Re-referred to Coms. on HEALTH and APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

Sept. 7 Read third time. Amended. To third reading.

Sept. 4 Reconsideration granted.

Aug. 28 Motion to reconsider continued to September 4.

Aug. 27 Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 34. Noes 36. Page 2725.) Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member DeSaulnier.

July 3 Read second time. To third reading.

July 2 Read second time. Amended. To second reading.

June 28 From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.)

June 7 To Com. on H. & C.D.

May 31 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 15. Page 1127.) To Assembly.

May 31 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

Apr. 17 Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

Apr. 16 From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 519.)

Apr. 9 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

Mar. 28 Set for hearing April 10.

Mar. 20 Hearing postponed by committee.

Mar. 15 To Com. on JUD. Set for hearing March 27.

Feb. 26 Read first time.

Feb. 25 From print. May be acted upon on or after March 27.

Feb. 23 Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

SB 1177(Ridley-Thomas) Dispute resolution.

Introduced: 02/08/2008

Last Amend: 04/10/2008

Status: 06/25/2008-Read second time. To third reading.

Location: 06/25/2008-A THIRD READING

 

Summary: Existing law requires the Administrative Office of the Courts to make monthly distributions from superior court filing fees for the support of specified dispute resolution programs established by counties. Existing law authorizes a county receiving a distribution to increase the amount of that distribution and limits the amount to be distributed to no more than $8 per filing fee. This bill would instead limit the amount to be distributed to an unspecified amount. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature that the Judicial Council establish an advisory commission on civil court fees to evaluate the needs of programs supported by revenue from civil fees and to determine whether increases in the maximum allowable distributions are necessary to ensure that the programs are adequately funded, taking into consideration past funding increases, the demonstrated need for a fee increase, and the benefit that the local programs provide to the courts.

 

History:

June 25 Read second time. To third reading.

June 24 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.)

June 23 Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 5823.)

June 10 Hearing postponed by committee.

May 1 To Com. on JUD.

Apr. 22 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

Apr. 21 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 15. Page 3507.) To Assembly.

Apr. 10 Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

Apr. 9 From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 3348.)

Mar. 19 Set for hearing April 8.

Feb. 21 To Com. on JUD.

Feb. 12 From print. May be acted upon on or after March 13.

Feb. 8 Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

 

Position: Sponsor

 

SB 1286(Machado) Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation.

Introduced: 02/19/2008

Last Amend: 06/16/2008

Status: 06/23/2008-Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee.

Location: 06/23/2008-S B. & F.

 

Summary: Existing law, the Escrow Law, provides for licensure and regulation by the Commissioner of Corporations of persons engaged in business as escrow agents, unless specifically exempted. Existing law requires persons licensed as escrow agents to be members of the Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation (Fidelity Corporation), which is established as a nonprofit corporation to indemnify its members against loss, and which is funded by fees and assessments on its members. Existing law limits the coverage provide by Fidelity Corporation to certain types of transactions and provides that indemnity coverage for other transactions be provided by escrow agents through bonding requirements. This bill would require any private insurance coverage of a member, that also covers a loss that would be covered by Fidelity Corporation, to be applied as primary coverage. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

 

History:

June 23 Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee.

June 17 Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

June 16 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.

May 15 To Com. on B. & F.

May 8 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 1. Page 3709.) To Assembly.

May 8 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

Apr. 29 Read second time. To third reading.

Apr. 28 From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

Apr. 17 From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3522.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Set for hearing April 28.

Apr. 7 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., F. & I.

Mar. 27 Set for hearing April 16.

Feb. 28 To Com. on B., F. & I.

Feb. 20 From print. May be acted upon on or after March 21.

Feb. 19 Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

SB 1296(Corbett) Public Employment Relations Board.

Introduced: 02/19/2008

Last Amend: 06/17/2008

Status: 07/03/2008-Read second time. To third reading.

Location: 07/03/2008-A THIRD READING

 

Summary: The Meyers-Milias-Brown Act delegates jurisdiction to the Public Employment Relations Board to resolve disputes and enforce the statutory duties and rights of local public agency employers and employees. The bill would provide that superior courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction over actions involving interest arbitration when the action involves an employee organization that represents firefighters , as specified.

 

History:

July 3 Read second time. To third reading.

July 2 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)

June 17 Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

June 16 From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)

May 22 To Com. on JUD.

May 1 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 5. Page 3635.) To Assembly.

May 1 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

Apr. 23 Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

Apr. 22 From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.

Apr. 14 From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 3349.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Set for hearing April 21.

Mar. 26 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

Mar. 19 Set for hearing April 8.

Mar. 13 Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Mar. 6 Set for hearing March 25.

Feb. 28 To Com. on JUD.

Feb. 20 From print. May be acted upon on or after March 21.

Feb. 19 Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

SB 1387(Padilla) Dental coverage: provider overpayments.

Introduced: 02/21/2008

Last Amend: 05/07/2008

Status: 07/03/2008-Read second time. To third reading.

Location: 07/03/2008-A THIRD READING

 

Summary: Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. This bill would enact various provisions regarding overpayments by plans and health insurers providing dental coverage . The bill would require that the overpayment notice sent by the plan or insurer contain specified information. In addition, the bill would specifically provide that an overpayment is contested if the provider has disputed the overpayment through the dispute resolution mechanism provided by the plan or insurer or if, within 30 calendar days following the conclusion of that mechanism, the provider has filed a written complaint regarding the alleged overpayment with the Department of Insurance or the Office of Provider Oversight, as applicable. The bill would require that a provider filing that written complaint notify the plan or insurer of the complaint in writing within a specified period of time and would require the Department of Managed Health Care or the Department of Insurance to take specified actions with respect to the complaint . The bill would also prohibit the plan or insurer from attempting to collect a contested overpayment until the conclusion of the dispute resolution mechanism and, if a complaint is filed, the receipt of the department's or commissioner's determination regarding the complaint. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

 

History:

July 3 Read second time. To third reading.

July 2 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)

June 18 From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

May 22 To Com. on HEALTH.

May 13 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

May 12 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 3753.) To Assembly.

May 8 Read second time. To third reading.

May 7 Read second time. To third reading. Read third time. Amended. To second reading.

May 6 From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

Apr. 28 Set for hearing May 5.

Apr. 21 Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Apr. 17 From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3370.)

Apr. 3 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

Mar. 24 Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. Set for hearing April 9.

Mar. 13 Set for hearing April 2.

Feb. 28 To Com. on HEALTH.

Feb. 22 From print. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

Feb. 21 Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

SB 1407(Perata) Court facilities: financing.

Introduced: 02/21/2008

Last Amend: 07/02/2008

Status: 07/02/2008-Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Location: 07/02/2008-A APPR.

 

Summary:  The Trial Court Facilities Act of 2002 establishes the State Court Facilities Construction Fund and provides that moneys in that fund may be used to acquire, rehabilitate, construct, or finance court facilities, as defined, and to implement trial court projects in designated counties, as specified. This bill would extend the purposes for which moneys in that fund may be used to include the planning, design, construction, rehabilitation, replacement, leasing, or acquisition of court facilities. The bill would establish the Immediate and Critical Needs Account of the State Court Facilities Construction Fund, the proceeds of which would be used for the planning, design, construction, rehabilitation, renovation, replacement, or acquisition of court facilities, for the repayment of moneys appropriated for lease of court facilities pursuant to the issuance of lease-revenue bonds, and for the payment for lease or rental of court facilities. The bill would require the Judicial Council to make recommendations to the Governor and the Legislature for projects based on its determination that the need for a project is most immediate and critical, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

 

History:

July 2 Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

July 1 From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.)

June 24 From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

June 23 Joint Rule 62(a) file notice (Com. on JUD.) suspended. (Page 5823.) Joint Rule 62(a) file notice (Com. on PUB. S.) suspended. (Page 5823.)

June 18 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

June 17 Hearing postponed by committee.

June 12 To Coms. on JUD. and PUB. S.

May 29 Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 8. Page 4012.) To Assembly.

May 29 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

May 27 From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3906.) Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

May 19 Placed on APPR. suspense file. Set for hearing May 22.

May 14 From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 3783.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Set for hearing May 19.

May 6 From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 3688.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD. Set for hearing May 13.

May 1 Re-referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD. Set for hearing May 6.

Apr. 28 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

Apr. 10 Set for hearing April 15.

Feb. 28 To Com. on RLS.

Feb. 22 From print. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

Feb. 21 Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

SB 1734(Kuehl) Hospitals: level of care.

Introduced: 02/22/2008

Last Amend: 05/20/2008

Status: 06/18/2008-From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Location: 06/18/2008-A APPR.

 

Summary: Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to license and regulate health facilities, including general acute care hospitals. This bill would prohibit a real estate investment trust that owns real property in the state where a licensed general acute care hospital is situated, and where the owner or operator of the hospital has announced an intention to sell any portion of its interest in the hospital, from amending, modifying, or terminating a lease of, or selling any interest in, the real property if this would result in a reduction of care provided by the hospital or the closure of the hospital, except with approval from the department based upon a specified finding. This bill contains other related provisions.

 

History:

June 18 From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

June 5 To Com. on HEALTH.

May 27 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 14. Page 3959.) To Assembly.

May 27 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

May 23 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 4. Page 3911.) Read second time. To third reading.

May 20 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

May 15 Set for hearing May 22.

May 5 Placed on APPR. suspense file.

Apr. 28 Set for hearing May 5.

Apr. 17 Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Apr. 16 From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2. Page 3371.)

Mar. 13 To Com. on HEALTH. Set for hearing March 26. Hearing postponed by committee. Set for hearing April 9.

Feb. 25 Read first time.

Feb. 24 From print. May be acted upon on or after March 25.

Feb. 22 Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

 

Position: Watch

 

 




1430 South Grand Avenue # 256
Glendora, CA 91740
Phone: 866-216-CDRC (2372)
Fax: 626-974-5439

Copyright CDRC © 2010
This site managed with Dynamic Website Technology from Mediate.com
Products and Services